Side-by-side comparison: pricing, features, free trial, and verified scores.
Applied creates a fairer candidate experience through anonymised applications and structured reviews.
Qualtrics EmployeeXM measures candidate and employee experience through surveys, listening programs, and real-time analytics.
| Feature |
A
Applied CX Anonymised Hiring
Candidate Experience Platforms
|
Q
Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Candidate Experience Platforms
|
|---|---|---|
| Scores (Verified User Reviews) | ||
| Support Score |
7.1/5
|
8.6/5
|
| Maintain Score |
7.1/5
|
9.4/5
|
| Platform Score |
9.3/5
|
8.3/5
|
| Total Reviews | 9 verified reviews | 2 verified reviews |
| Key Specifications | ||
| Category | Candidate Experience Platforms | Candidate Experience Platforms |
| Best For | Midmarket | Enterprise |
| Pricing Model | Subscription | Custom |
| Starting Price | £249/month | Custom |
| Free Trial | ✓ Yes | No |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Category-Specific Features | ||
| Anonymised Applications | Yes | — |
| Work Sample Tests | Yes | — |
| Bias Reporting | Yes | — |
| CX Surveys | — | Yes |
| Real-time Analytics | — | Yes |
| NPS Tracking | — | Yes |
| View Full Details | View Applied CX Anonymised Hiring | View Qualtrics EmployeeXM |
It depends on your priorities. Applied CX Anonymised Hiring stands out for: Applied CX Anonymised Hiring offers a free trial — Qualtrics EmployeeXM does not list one. Applied CX Anonymised Hiring uses subscription pricing.
Both are Candidate Experience Platforms tools. See the full comparison table below for pricing, deployment, and feature differences.
Applied CX Anonymised Hiring uses subscription pricing, while Qualtrics EmployeeXM uses custom pricing. Check each vendor's site for current rates.