Both Hired Creative Tech Roles and Working Not Working Creatives are Creative Recruitment Tools tools. Hired Creative Tech Roles is best for startup, while Working Not Working Creatives is best for midmarket. This page compares pricing, deployment, and features side by side to help you decide which fits your team.
Hired reaches UX designers, product designers, and creative technologists through its tech talent marketplace.
Working Not Working is a curated freelance platform for premium creative talent in advertising and design.
| Feature |
H
Hired Creative Tech Roles
Creative Recruitment Tools
|
W
Working Not Working Creatives
Creative Recruitment Tools
|
|---|---|---|
| Scores (RecruitsAgent Score) | ||
| Support Score |
9.1/10
|
9.0/10
|
| Maintain Score |
9.1/10
|
7.9/10
|
| Platform Score |
8.2/10
|
9.5/10
|
| Key Specifications | ||
| Category | Creative Recruitment Tools | Creative Recruitment Tools |
| Best For | Startup | Midmarket |
| Pricing Model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Starting Price | Custom | $200/month |
| Free Trial | No | No |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | No |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Category-Specific Features | ||
| UX + Product Design Focus | Yes | — |
| Salary Transparency | Yes | — |
| Pre-vetted Talent | Yes | — |
| Curated Creative Network | — | Yes |
| Advertising + Design Focus | — | Yes |
| Freelance Specialist | — | Yes |
| View Full Details | View Hired Creative Tech Roles | View Working Not Working Creatives |
It depends on your priorities. Hired Creative Tech Roles stands out for: Hired Creative Tech Roles includes AI-powered features. Hired Creative Tech Roles is positioned for startup teams.
Both are Creative Recruitment Tools tools. See the full comparison table below for pricing, deployment, and feature differences.
Both use subscription pricing — check each vendor's site for current rates.