Both Hired.com and LinkedIn Recruiter are Candidate Sourcing tools. Hired.com is best for midmarket, while LinkedIn Recruiter is best for all. This page compares pricing, deployment, and features side by side to help you decide which fits your team.
Hired's marketplace flips recruiting — candidates make profiles and companies apply to them, creating higher response rates.
LinkedIn Recruiter is the world's largest professional network talent sourcing tool with advanced search filters and InMail messaging.
| Feature |
H
Hired.com
Candidate Sourcing
|
L
LinkedIn Recruiter
Candidate Sourcing
|
|---|---|---|
| Scores (RecruitsAgent Score) | ||
| Support Score |
8.1/10
|
7.4/10
|
| Maintain Score |
8.6/10
|
9.0/10
|
| Platform Score |
8.4/10
|
6.8/10
|
| Key Specifications | ||
| Category | Candidate Sourcing | Candidate Sourcing |
| Best For | Midmarket | All |
| Pricing Model | Subscription | Subscription |
| Starting Price | Custom | From $825/month |
| Free Trial | No | No |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Integrations & Coverage | ||
| Listed integrations | 2 listed: Greenhouse, Lever | 5 listed: Greenhouse, iCIMS, Lever, SmartRecruiters, Workday |
| Integrations in common | Greenhouse, Lever | |
| Countries listed | 18 countries | 35 countries |
| Category-Specific Features | ||
| AI Recommendations | — | Yes |
| Database | — | 900M+ profiles |
| InMail Credits | — | Included |
| Reverse Marketplace | Yes | — |
| Salary Benchmarking | Yes | — |
| Skills Assessment | Yes | — |
| View Full Details | View Hired.com | View LinkedIn Recruiter |
It depends on your priorities. Hired.com stands out for: Hired.com is positioned for midmarket teams. Hired.com has a higher RecruitsAgent Score (8.4/5).
Both are Candidate Sourcing tools. See the full comparison table below for pricing, deployment, and feature differences.
Both use subscription pricing — check each vendor's site for current rates.