Side-by-side comparison: pricing, features, free trial, and verified scores.
Plum uses industrial-organizational psychology to match people to roles based on their natural talents rather than credentials.
Conversational screening forms that achieve 2x completion rates — candidates actually finish them.
| Feature |
P
Plum.io
Candidate Assessments
|
T
Typeform
Candidate Assessments
|
|---|---|---|
| Scores (Verified User Reviews) | ||
| Support Score |
8.5/5
|
No reviews yet |
| Maintain Score |
6.7/5
|
No reviews yet |
| Platform Score |
7.7/5
|
No reviews yet |
| Total Reviews | 14 verified reviews | 0 verified reviews |
| Key Specifications | ||
| Category | Candidate Assessments | Candidate Assessments |
| Best For | Midmarket | |
| Pricing Model | Subscription | Freemium |
| Starting Price | Custom | 25.00 |
| Free Trial | ✓ Yes | No |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | No |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Category-Specific Features | ||
| Talent DNA Profiling | Yes | — |
| Role Matching | Yes | — |
| Team Fit | Yes | — |
| View Full Details | View Plum.io | View Typeform |
It depends on your priorities. Plum.io stands out for: Plum.io offers a free trial — Typeform does not list one. Plum.io includes AI-powered features.
Both are Candidate Assessments tools. See the full comparison table below for pricing, deployment, and feature differences.
Plum.io uses subscription pricing, while Typeform uses freemium pricing. Check each vendor's site for current rates.